Why did the less popular LRT petition come up in a Google search?

Sometimes situations occur on the internet that at first seem completely illogical. This is just such a story.

One petition has raised more than one hundred thousand signatures. The other barely several thousand. However, it is the smaller one that appears at the top of Google searches. At first glance, this is surprising, but only until you look more closely.

What can be seen immediately

The incognito search test confirms that this is not a user-tailored result, but an overall Google view.

Why Google puts up a smaller petition

The first and most important factor is the name of the petition itself and the clarity of its content.
The smaller petition almost exactly replicates what people lead people to search for. This is a very strong signal to the search engine, which first looks for a text match. The larger petition has a detailed, valuable and more explanatory text with the names of journalists, but it is not focused on a specific phrase. Extensive and detailed text becomes information noise in Google's eyes, so the system sees it as a broader comment rather than as a response to a search query.

The second factor is the ever-changing timing of the renewal of the mini-petition.
Google evaluates whether a page looks alive. It is difficult to say why the time varies only on one page. It could be a technical feature of the platform, a minor fix or an automatic background update. The important thing is that Google sees this signal as relevance and novelty.

The third factor is the public noise on the subject.
Nowadays, there are a lot of comments on social networks, and some of them do not seem natural. Such „Troll” profiles cannot directly bring up a page in Google searches because the system has safeguards against automated behaviour. Google detects and filters unnatural activity so that the bots themselves do not change the ranking.

But they can affect people's behaviour. When there is a lot of noise, people naturally start searching for a certain phrase on the internet. If the same words are repeated in the title of a small petition, Google brings it up. Theoretically, bots could only be influenced by someone manually repeating the same search, but this would no longer be automated manipulation, but simply artificially mimicking real human behaviour.

The fourth factor relates to the Petition.lt platform itself.

Petition.lt provides only part of the information that Google would need to understand the importance of the page. Although it contains basic meta tags and OpenGraph information, the site lacks structured data in Schema.org format, canonical tags and clearly marked publication or update dates.

This can be checked on any page by opening the code and not finding it in the search application/ld+json or canonical references. In the absence of this data, Google cannot assess the number of signatures, the topical relevance or other social context we understand.

Because of this limited technical structure, the search engine relies on just three simple signals: the title, the text and the page refresh that Google sees. If a page looks active and its title better matches the keywords searched for, it rises higher even when it has fewer signatures.

Can it be said that the petition is deliberate?

It is worth speaking plainly and sincerely here. Chances are that the less-than-natural comments you see on social networks have influenced the words people have started to search for online. This may have influenced the search engine. However, there is no evidence that anyone has tried to manipulate Google search itself.

In the EU, all online advertising, especially political content, must be marked as sponsored. Therefore, if such content were to be pushed on a paid basis, it would be clearly labelled as such. This is not the case here, so it can be assumed that there is also no paid promotion and no petitioning.

It is most likely that several natural factors are driving the smaller petition higher. Its text is more suited to the words you are looking for. It looks new. It is more „talked about”, so people search for it more often. That can be enough to produce a search result that is quite different from what we would like.

What this case says

The most important thing to understand is that Google is not a place where popularity is measured. It is a system that sorts information according to what it thinks is best for a human query. As a result, sometimes a smaller page will end up at the top and a larger page will stay below. This is not an exception, it is simply the reality of the Internet.

If you are creating a project or story online

This situation illustrates the importance of clarity and consistency in content maintenance. That's all Google sees. Whether it's a petition, a business website or a public project.

If you're ever considering a clearly structured, high-visibility website, you can always ask. We'll discuss what it would take to make your project easier to find and more credible to both people and search engines.